[ QUOTE ]
Why cant nurseries use containers that are wider and resemble a trees natural rootzone? I know that they would take up more space but it seems like there would be a market for trees that dont come with gridled roots!
Mabey a rant post is needed.
[/ QUOTE ]
A few researchers--I believe Gilman is one--have been going the other direction, sort of. Since we know the vertical containers will lead to circling roots, they are trying to get nurseries to shave the root balls each time they repot, then they do the same at planting time. A small pot might only lose a half-inch or so, while a big container might lose a few inches. Apparently it is ow possible to buy trees that have been treated this way throughout their lives in parts of California and Florida. I'm pretty sure we still can't get them here in TX. The result is that the circling roots are removed, and they say there is still plenty of fine root growth inside the cut so that the trees quickly reach the edge of the new pots (which you can see for yourself by just raking off some soil from the trimmed root ball).
If you buy trees that have been girdled at every container change, is it still worthwhile to shave the root ball before you plant? I don't think any research addresses this question, but my guess is it's bound to be better than nothing.
Also in this vein, check out the Dec. "Arborist News" for an article on bare-rooting trees before transplanting.
edit--just realized this was following a bit of a derail--sorry, rocks.