Redwood Removal

good job,I noticed he was using the double prussik is that primarly a french concept.Just seems like I always notice that in the videos from france.Ive never really tried it but been meaning to some day.anyway good find Grover
 
Heck. I gave the video a thumbs up when I saw the bon fire!

I liked the gaff attachments on the bottom the shank.

I liked all the product mini commercials!

There have been some good tree videos popping up lately.
 
The trunk wood seemed to be coming off in sawlog lengths. I hope that it goes to a mill and not a burn pile or chipping.

Its interesting to see how large the Douglas fir, sequoias and redwoods have become in Europe in the roughly 150 years since their introduction.
 
[ QUOTE ]
That was pretty amazing. Slick as hell. (I secretly hate it when french people do well).

[/ QUOTE ]

laughabove.gif
 
Remarkable. That is so cool to watch.

This greenhorn who has no business asking questions about a job like this...

...is going to ask two questions anyway...

1) Would a Humboldt notch have been appropriate for felling those sections of the spar? That way the chunk of wood from the notch would have just slid right out, heavy as it probably was?

2) Why do the french climbers ascend the ropes on removals and then put their gaffs on? I remember seeing a different climber do this in the "French Pine Takedown" post put up a while back? Just preference probably??
 
My guess on the notch - trying to make the bottom cut on a Humboldt with that size saw up in a tree would be a major P.I.T.A. - more so than trying to get the face cut piece out of there after a typical notch. Make sense?

No clue on question 2
 
Another guess on the notch - Having the angle of the Humboldt coming down forces your lanyard lower and access rope, possibly increases the chance of it slipping up and over.
 
I have to nitpick here a little. Something bugs me about watching removal videos like this where the climber seems to do everything possible to avoid using his gaffs as they should be used. Stubs everywhere, ropes everywhere. To put a facecut in a tree that diameter while hanging from an overhead attachment point is not the safest method. You're pivoting around rather than standing firmly on your spikes, and if you do get a kickback from the 80cc plus saw, it just might cut your climbing line which will drop you smacking face first into one of those stubs. It's very common for a saw to kick a bit when cutting a large diameter facecut out. Another point is the type of facecut. Humboldt or conventional doesn't matter so much (although the point of removing a humboldt notch being easier than conventional is correct), but the height of the backcut above the apex of the notch does. The pull line obviously has a good bit of pretension on it, so if it just happens to go sooner than expected and your saw is in a kerf that is on the falling log, goodbye to that. There's no reason to be that high above the facecut, it only makes judging the holding wood more difficult. He would have been better off with much less holding wood, in fact the last piece nearly tore a strip down the side where his lanyard was.

Good video though, cool to get it recorded so well.
 
Interesting the non- use of a hitch minder pulley. Looked like he used a schwabich and ddrt sometimes, and the double prussic other times. I wonder what is the application/advantage of using double prussiks?
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom