RECREATIONAL TREE PRESERVATION

what if a group of arborists got together with the owners of nice large trees in need of a little hazard reduction to
1. have nice trees to climb and 2. to make things a little safer for the treeowner and their guests. It's a win-win for everybody, and if everyone treads lightly, there will be minimal negative impact on the tree. If pruning was limited to deadwood, there would be only a small pile of already to go firewood, that anyone could deal with. no chipper needed.
I know that climbing trees in town isn't the same as trees in the woods by any measure, but it is a nice way to get into those trees we all drive by and see huge deadwood looming over someone's driveway, and then in six months see topped off to half-height because the car was smashed and they hired the cheapest "tree service" to get rid of the problem. It could be considered recreational tree preservation.
 
Sign me up! It takes very little motivation to get me aloft in a nice tree. And hey if we can say to for the good of the tree then all the better.

I read lately about a Florida champion Taxodium distichum that was planned to be climbed until the Rangers put the nix to the climb. I hope that some day we can obtain a permit to climb limited to a certain geographical area and by submitting to both a gear check and climber skill certification. If we can get a researcher like a Phd in Botany to come along, then how can they deny the event if it is for canopy research?

I know I may be too optimistic but I am willing to try. After getting busted along the Bogachiel river I think we need to work with the authorities and make them some guidelines that we all can live with.

See you at the top,
Dan House
 
You need to contact the Marie Selby botanical gardens, in sarasota, I believe. They have been a big force in epiphyte and canopy research around the world, and would be an excellent place to begin asking around about contacting a local researcher.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom