Well said RescueMan.
The problem with arborists is that we use rope in a little different fassion than most- we go up and down without changing over systems or gear. We also stay on a 2 to 1 MA system. This being said, we don't use a standard prusik like most (as a grab on the rope), rather we use it to ascend and descend. The difference also is that 1/2 our weight is supported by the knot (theoretically).
We also have a tendency to tweak knots to our liking. We add a wrap, a twist here, try it with a loop or a strand of cord... We get a little off the charts. So, a prusik cord that is ideal for grabbing a rope without letting go would be the safest, but might not be effiecient enough for everyday use as we use it. In otherwords, sometimes we walk the line between how quick a cord will grab and how well it will release (to move up). That's why so many of us have these different knots we try in the field that soon become main stream. For example, the french prusik, machard tresse, valdotain, XT, Distel and so on.
Does this make sense?
Do you ever try any exotic fiber cord in the rescue world?