Post Katrina tree assessment program

After beating my head against the wall trying to get the USFS down there to accept restoration pruning using any criteria beyond the 1/3 rule, I gave up. They mandate the removal of a lot of very salvageable trees, while preaching "environmental sustainabilty".

Good intentions, bad information.
 
I have to agree with guymayor on this one one of the arborists I work with just came back from Katrina land as he calls it and had pics of trees that where salvagable and well they are no more.
He would like to have a movie for all to see about the devestation down there to have a better way for hazard tree removals and for municipals to get a better feel for salvage of tree instaed of cut it down method. As he said with a shrug of the shuolders " time to prune does not equal time to cut down"
 
people's fear of trees has increased across the board since Katrina. It becam imediatly harder to convince people that their trees will not kill them in their sleep. When you mention the value of the shade, they shrug and say they have airconditioning. I can only hope that the energy prices going up will temper that false security from a very hot and dangerous sun. It became very difficult to explain how a solid tree will actually protect your home from storms, especially a tree that proved itself in Katrina.

Do you know how the processing of all that wood has been? Have they been setting up mills around. is it going to the pulp mills to process along with those factory pines they grow down there? I saw in Mississippi they had set up huge burn piles with big fans blowing on them, are they still doing that?.
 
To treebing he says yes to all the questions about the where the trees and brush are going. At this time he is off to the central US to asesse tornado damage, He shruggs alot of it off but I know he does not like working for the insurancs comp. to do damage reports. In the long run a good program would do allot of good for everyone who takes on the damage reports and jobs to clean them up. As he says better have a pro there just incase the people need a had with the money issuses that come with the claims.
 
Has anyone read the article in Arborist News on this?

Surprisingly straight talk, it seems after the first skim. We got a long way to go.
 
Back
Top Bottom