Bobster,
Here's a second opinion for you. All in all, I agree with Treespotter. The bottom line with the 192 is that it's underpowered in some situations. If you're used to running a 200, at first the 192 will probably feel underpowerd in all situations. But you'll come to realize that for some applications the 192 is fine. For me the 192 worked ok as a trim saw if I was dealing with branches relatively small in diameter. But if I had to cut an occasional larger horizontal side limb its lack of power became an issue. The issue was not that the saw couldn't cut through a 6"-8" limb, but that since it was so slow in doing so, limbs would often have the opportunity to slowly hinge tip-down before breaking off the tree, and that can lead to some real slop-trimming problems as butt ends can flop around wreaking havoc on obstacles below. Sure, this shouldn't happen if properly undercut, but the problem for me was that the slow-cutting 192 didn't always make as large of an undercut as I wanted before the weight of the limb binds down on the bar. Don't get me wrong. All this stuff can be done correctly and work out just fine with a 192 and I'm sure 10 guys will tell you they love their 192 or their Echo or any other saw that lets you keep a few dollars in your pocket in exchange for a watered-down tool. They're right about one thing: it can work just fine. I agree. You could also travel across the country in a covered wagon with a couple horses. That would work just fine too. It's just that in certain situations, it makes the job a little easier and a lot nicer to have more cutting speed which you get from the 200's power. So, while the 192 is good enough for small branch trimming, if you work in trees for a living, it makes more sense to get the tool that can handle a wider scope of situations. That's just my thought. You're entirly free to take the covered wagon, but I vote for the car. It's a much nicer way to travel. Alex