Sometimes I hate the "what's the best?" threads... not because I doubt the various opinions, but because how you are rigging changes the answer. For example, we have so many elm trees here, it's crazy. Long leaders, not very big around, tall trees. Close to targets. I often have to pick a rigging TIP that is high up on stems that are only a few inches in diameter. The all-polyester ropes (Sta-Set, Stable Braid, etc.) can break out the TIP with any significant shock loading. The nylon-core ropes (Husky, Polydyne, etc.) have much better energy absorption and usually don't do this. In those cases, I have plenty of vertical space for the stretch. So, the best rope in that scenario is not the best rope for say, when I have a lower, larger TIP and am trying to ease a large limb off the tree that is hanging right over the roof of the house or Grandma's prized Azalea bushes. Then, I want the less dynamic ropes because they are a lot easier to control the load without it swinging and bouncing around.
I think you have to consider how you are rigging and what you are rigging the most, if you're hoping to get by with one rope for awhile. I don't think I could do that, anymore. I have gotten spoiled on having more choices at my disposal. Husky, Polydyne for great energy absorption, Sta-Set, Stable Braid for great control. I haven't personally noticed any difference as far as abrasion/glazing resistance, that couldn't be attributed to things like too small of a bollard on the lowering device or trying to drop pieces that are too heavy. The exception would be the 3-strand ropes. Look at the angle the cover strands on a double-braid lay, in respect to the rope direction, compared to a 3-strand rope and you'll easily see why the 3-strand ropes are so abrasion resistant. They slip right over and around things because the strands, especially under load, are much more parallel to the rope direction.
I keep some of those around, too. I know a lot of folks think that's ancient technology, but they're cheap and tough and get the job done.