[ QUOTE ]
Thanks. Your a tough bunch. I know the spec wasn't ideal, but these are protected trees and the council here would never give permission to fell them. We did another on this site a few years back which was in a real bad way (honey fungus,cavities,etc) and they refused permission to fell that. I'll add some photos, there was decay on multiple stems and the leaders were begining to subside so we had to do something.
Holm Oaks are pretty resilient and will fluff out, they tend to decay slowly too. I guess they'll be pollarde again in 7-10 years.
I wanted to film this job as there was no real central leaders so it was an interesting rigging situation. To drop the lumps I wanted to we had to share the loading on 2 top anchors. The ground crew are excellent.
For the record I removed my spkies for the fininshed cuts. Who cares if I spiked the topps? they went anyway
[/ QUOTE ]
Ahh yes, I also do have spikes sent up to me if I'm removing a whole leader, then send them down again before I touch any of the rest of the tree.
Yes, interesting rigging situation. Thanks for sharing it.
That's amazing they will take 7-10 years to get back to that height again, that is really slow. Not familar with the specie, they must be really rot resistant not to rot out from those size cuts.
But.... why was the tree topped? To give someone a better view? I would imagine that oak is likely a strong tree if it wasn't hacked before. Over here, many uneducated property owners want their tree topped because they are worried about the trees height; they think topping will make it a safer tree.
Take care and thanks again for sharing.