Muggs
Been here much more than a while
- Location
- Canuckistan
I have long wondered how much the bury affects the strength, behind the 2 locking brummels...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HowNot2 has a video where they do a locking brummel on dyneema, but with no bury and it pulls out at frighteningly low force. I'll go dig it up.I have long wondered how much the bury affects the strength, behind the 2 locking brummels...
Is that the same as what is elsewhere referred to as a straight bury, just with a longer bury because it is class 2?Another splice to consider is Samson’s Tuck-Bury for class II ropes. I’ve had several tested and they broke at 98 1/2%.
A fid and a half retains 75%, no bury, generally 50%.
so I was wrong, they do a one fid bury and it slips out at half the MBS
almost as slippery, but close. and yea, I believe that polyester would perform much betterYeah but I have a hard time believing this affects type 1 fibres in the same way... don't they say that dyneema is as slippery as teflon?
That’s to be 100% expected with dyneema. It’s slippery as f and requires something like 3.5x the bury length of polyesterHowNot2 has a video where they do a locking brummel on dyneema, but with no bury and it pulls out at frighteningly low force. I'll go dig it up.
These are a couple of Samson mentions of brummels. Though neither are stand alone instructions and the whoopie has no taper. The whoopie I had broken broke at about 89% of the ABS and it broke right at the end of the bury which is the same point that the adjustment leg exits.Samson recommends full bury, it is supposed to be stronger. I don't think their splicing manual even shows how to do brummels. Really looking forward to seeing the results from your deadeyes John.