[ QUOTE ]
Your right, all trees are important. Losing a nice one in a prominent location is a blow to the quality of life for a community. Logging isn't even that bad, some wildlife benifit from the regrowth and the forest will come back over time. It's the permenent loss that concerns me. Roads for tourism and mining and the need for bigger and bigger houses. All new subdivisions around here are a minimum 2 acres lots so they can have septic feilds. We're spreading far and wide.
[/ QUOTE ]
Right on! My own brother is building a new house. Contract signed. The property was a pasture or hay field before. Thanks to urban sprawl it is now prime real estate. There are plenty of good old houses in town he could have bought! I guess I didn't try hard enough to convince him. Really, I would have had to convince his wife. Near impossible.
Anyway, it just seems to me UL would have known better. They have some great old trees on campus and some nice new ones. And prior to this, they have done very well preserving their canopy. Here in Louisville that 40-70 year old range is what is missing the most, IMO. There are old trees and young ones. Not as many mid range. If you look at the parkways you'll see it.