U-RIG -- a new approach to MA for tree work

I have two Playlists of YouTube that have been getting some attention and drawing questions:

"Stumpin' : Mechanical Advantage Rigging
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUlSYuIlSMrSoqZxg1orpU6de1fLhr7ws



uRIG Pocket Mechanical Advantage for Tree Work
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUlSYuIlSMrSrf1flxTpFo2sOLcg1Be72



My "Stumpin' " rig can lay over 21 tons on a stump. You've seen it rip 3/4" tREX like tissue paper and pull out some big damn stumps ...


DSCN4248.JPG


DSCN4222.JPG




By contrast,the uRIG is good for 1 ton swl. Regardless, it's one of the most useful rigs I've ever built.


Occasionally a newbie (remember, we all started somewhere) will get those confused. What you see below is an email response to questions republished here in the hope that it might be useful to somebody as a VERY basic primer ...


Hello xxxxx,

Thanks for the interest. I’d be glad to help …

First let me say that I love the uRIG system. I use it all the time around the place. The Rock Exotica hardware is like wonderful jewelry and the overall design is balanced and useful under many situations.

But I don’t use the uRIG for pulling stumps: it’s not strong enough. You’ll find my stumping rig shown in a number of other videos. My big stumping rig is sized for 17 tons swl in the dual snatch and 21.25T against the stump. (Admittedly, that’s huge. Some would say ridiculous.)

The P51D at the head end of the uRIG has an mbs of 36kN. That’s 8100# breaking strength. With a safety factor of 4:1, that delivers a safe working load of about one (1) ton. Huge difference. I made the “MA vs. straight pull” video to illustrate the power of mechanical advantage but it was a very small stump and the tree had already been pulled over by a windstorm. Please see the “replies” thread under the vid “uRIG build details” to see the limitations.

It’s entirely possible that the uRIG could be the “front end” of a compound system, pulling on another bigger set of pulleys. But even in that application, it wouldn’t be a great choice because you don’t need the prussics to pull a stump. Where it really shines is a hand-drawn application where you need to raise, hold then lower a load. For that it’s a great little system.

As you think through your system, let me give you some basic info that could be useful …

Mbs = maximum breaking strength
Swl = safe working load
Sf = safety factor
swl = mbs/sf


The total load on a pulley is the tension force multiplied by the number of strands. For example, if you have a dual snatch block seeing 1 ton of tension in its rope, the pulley needs to be rated swl = 1T x 4 = 4 tons. That would imply 16 tons mbs.

Hardware (pulleys, shackles, but not Rock Exotica) and rigging slings (endless polyester rigging loops, see TrucknTow.com) are usually speced as swl. Cordage is usually speced as mbs (see Samsonrope.com for different products and mbs at different sizes).

For hardware, the sf is often taken at 4:1; for cordage, sf is typically 10:1. For critical applications (overhead lifting, life support) the sf is much higher. For non-critical application (like stumping), you can invade those safety factors somewhat PROVIDED THAT THE OPERATOR IS PROPERLY PROTECTED FROM COMPONENT FAILURE (see the vid “Proof testing the E/E Sling). NEVER stand unprotected in the line of fire and NEVER “lunge” into a rig with a vehicle.

To build up a system design, start with the pulling device/vehicle that you intend to use. Estimate/calibrate its pulling force. You need to get this right because, in effect, the pulling device will become your “mechanical fuse” protecting your entire rig. You don’t want it capable of delivering more force than your rig can handle.

Then estimate the final force that you want to lay against the load. That will give you the mechanical advantage that you need. Remember that more strength is always good but too much MA can work against you. In my vids, you’ll see systems ranging from 5:1 to 42:1. Sometimes the MA can come from a “simple” system, like a block and tackle or it can come from “compound” systems, one pulling on the other.


Your other questions …
The rigging slings I use are either “endless round polyester rigging slings” or chains.

For these devices, you have three (3) choices when you form the connection: straight, basket, and choked. The “straight” connection is 1 x swl. The “basket” delivers 2 x swl. The “choke” reduces swl by 25%.

I don’t remember where I got that bag and I can’t find any manufactures mark on it. Sorry. I have had some luck with carrying bags shown on eBay for lighting equipment and tripods. There are nice offerings, reasonably priced, that have the right general shape. Pay attention to the size dimensions. The uRIG fits into a bag 20x6x6.

I hope this helps with your project, Rich. Once you get familiar with a few basics, this won’t be anywhere near as complicated as I’ve made this sound … !
Good luck.

Tom Hoffmann














 
Very nice, clean simple strategy.
Traxion?
.
90 degree offset solution to keep lines from scrubbing in opposite directions is what i'd see on some old farm etc. gear growing up .
http://www.photographers1.com/Sailing/BlockAndTackle.gif
.
For prusik, might try hollow Tenex type.
This would give larger footprint grab area, and as it flattens out, then as flattens presents no real leverage-able dimension on the bent axis(cuz is flat..) so maintains most relative/positional tensile (of it's absolute tensile).
It also seats tighter to host line w/less resistance.
3/8" hollow Tenex was my friction hitch for a decade or so(of naysayers).
.
Larger rope is heavier, but then sits up higher from sheave and pivot, outer strands carry load making them the cranking leverage arm around pulley pivot frictions...so can be more efficient/longer leverage over frictions (i think i L-earned that here from Bob Thorn and it stuck as a counter-intuitive point to watch; and to stay rite on the numbers and patterns, and to not just watch the shapes but forces in them like thermal vision).
.
But, sometimes it isn't how big (or shiny, light etc.) it is; but how you use it!
(Think i heard that somehweres)
5x can become 8x etc. thru insetting to compound effects of pulls,

.
saveForces_6.png

.
Which follows thru to inset, rather than extend a system pull with another system.
mytreelessons.com/Marlinspike_%20Sailor_Rig.htm
.
calculating on conserving forces usually leaking to 'ground connection' (electrical force flow thru wire imagery);
but rather folding back those forces against target, to not use 110v of fuse box, but full 220v / both legs of force.
And, when can schedule straight arm passive/active lifts with legs (straight arm locked less energy then bent under strain).
.
Will of the Ninja(in the spirit of fave Dr.Dyer's Force of Intention writings from the Active Side of Infinity) expressed to recycle usually wasted force/leaked to express on ground;
rather than a closed more efficient system that pairallells a typical tree DdRT(?) closed system
(kinda reversed to lift load, not be load)
will_lift_3.png
 
Last edited:
@dsptech; Hey, it is a huge relief to hear that Tom Hoffmann was still around as of February 2018. He seems to have disappeared from the forums, and has not posted any new videos on YouTube in quite some time, if I'm seeing things correctly. It had me worried a bit, because he seems to have such a strong and active mind, he'd have a hard time turning it off. I hope he is ok, and just enjoying time to himself, or something.

Thanks for your post.

Tim
 
I recall he was moving, but I haven't heard of him since.

When I started climbing, Tom's videos of climb systems really made me think. Looking back I found that very challenging, but it really drew me in challenged me to learn more and improved my climbing.

Here's hoping Tom returns (with whatever he damn pleases!!) Love your work @oldfart
 
@TimBr
Had a phone conversation with him a few months ago over his stump pulling setup.
I had tracked down similar gear that he used and had some questions.
He was gracious enough to call me and we had a good long talk.
He's like a rock star to me so I was humbled by his gesture.

He told me his vision was failing so he wasn't going to climb anymore.
Was sad to hear that.
I told him how much he meant to the community and to continue to visit the forums.
I don't think his heart is in it anymore.
 
Last edited:

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom