Tree-Sitter Lawsuits Against Maxxam/Pacific Lumber

Eureka, CA - Two more tree-sitters who had been forcibly removed from threatened ancient redwoods in Northern California have filed lawsuits against Maxxam Corporation, Pacific Lumber (PL), and the men hired to seize them high above the ground. Amy Gershman and Jamie Kohler joined fellow tree-sitters Jeny Card, Lindsey Holm, Kristi Sanchez, Scott Petersen and Anna Farnam in filing counter suits January 14, 2005 related to the string of tree-sit evictions that occurred in the forested hills above the tiny hamlet of Freshwater, California in the spring of 2003.

The seven tree-sitters, along with more than twenty other local residents and protestors were slapped with a lawsuit by PL that charged trespass and conspiracy. A SLAPP suit is a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. The activists' counter suits include allegations of assault, battery, negligence, infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and violation of their civil rights.

Unlike most of the other redwood giants formerly occupied by activists to protect them, the trees Gershman and Kohler sat in are still standing. Kohler was the third tree-sitter to be evicted from the ancient redwood known as “Jerry,” from which Card (better known as marathon tree-sitter “Remedy”) and Sanchez were also removed. Gershman, another long term tree-sitter whose feet didn’t touch the ground for seven months, was removed from a giant, double trunk redwood dubbed “Everlasting Life.” The two trees are still occupied by tree-sitters on tiny tree-top platforms. Maxxam/PL still intends to have the trees cut down.

The SLAPP suit is on hold following a move by attorneys for the PL-hired extractors that disqualified Judge W. Bruce Watson. Humboldt County Superior Court Judge Dale Reinholtsen will rule soon on whether the disqualification was legal, and determine whether he or Judge Watson will take on the case.
##

www.contrast.org/treesit
 
Good luck and Godspeed on this countermeasure Remedy. Small successes come seldom but you've managed to indirectly save at least one giant from the monster.

The legal team is costly, and I'm not refering to yours. To have the cases complicate is perhaps an excellent unexpected strategy, five lawyers are much more expensive than 40 redwood's board feet. Maxxam and PL afterall think only in terms of money and you're certainly running-up the antie.
 
I also owe my life to have known and lived in "the shadow of giants". We all are and have because.

Browsing my client list I found it rather poinient that Maxxam's CFO is here locally, praising my techniques for saving his old oaks. I intend to provide him a poetic lesson in the interelationships of all living things - the basic principles in restoration back to what was before we changed things. He understands clearly he can not enjoy both (or profit from assessments) the needs of his majestic trees and the carefully constructed altered landscape, the preferences he brought from Houston to apply here. Far from his own surroundings the same elements occur. Tempted to force a comparison by example, instead instruct him subtly, I'll try this once.

Suppose "chance" brought us together but I believe in magic often. More often we deny these blatant examples that everything is relative, but I keep both my hopes up and my perspective open.

Again, good luck on that end.
 
Re: Tree-Sitter Lawsuits Against Maxxam/Pacific Lu

Thanks for your encouragement:) You are right - those corporate lawyers are expensive. It would have been less costly to leave me in the tree. The audacity of their lawsuit against us makes it irresistible to fight. Maxxam has racked up hundreds of violations of water quality laws and the endangered species act, and has caused permanent damage to downstream residents. Their position that I should pay for the rest of my life for opposing their wanton destruction is ludicrous.

It's synchronistic that you mention the "Shadow of Giants." That's the name of a play by our local theatre company about the treesits and the forced removal of treesitters. The name refers to both the magnificent trees, and the corporations that are destroying them. Based on real events and people involved in this struggle, "Shadow of Giants” weaves our local issues with the greater challenges facing our world at this time. If anyone is going to be in Humboldt County, California March 3-6, I highly recommend checking it out. The play will also tour the West Coast later in the year. The following link is a review of the play.

http://www.arcataeye.com/scene/040621scene03.shtml

Good luck teaching "poetic lesson in the interrelationships of all living things" to Maxxam. I'll be thinking of you.

Remedy
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom