The Wild Trees: book is out 4/10

[ QUOTE ]
I did find some of Preston's words unlike any I have ever heard used to describe climbing and tree work.

[/ QUOTE ]

Everywhere you go they are calling things by different names. I wasn't really suprised by some of the terms, but I did raise an eyebrow, as it wasn't something I have heard.

love
nick
 
There is a review of The Wild Trees in the Sunday, May 6, 2007 Toronto Star, by James MacGowan. The review is pretty poorly thought out and written, but essentially says you will like the parts about climbing tall trees. The concluding line is "...., few who read this book will come away without a desire to reach for the sky themselves."

Link:
http://www.thestar.com/artsentertainment/article/210874
 
Here's the address to the New York Times review of the book. Published in the paper on April 19th.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/19/books/...c8d&ei=5070

The author refers to tree climbers as quirky throughout the article. I'm not sure how weird it is to want to climb a redwood and discover an entirely new ecosystem. Sounds more like pioneering or amazing or spectacular than quirky, but whatever floats their boat. At least it got reviewed by the New York Times. Always a guarantee to sell more books.
Moss gets a shout out in the article though, so that's worth something.
 
moss, great drawings; one of the best parts about this book! I just got the book about a week ago and have managed to make it more than half way through, even though finals are this week. Anyway, so far it's a pretty interesting read, mainly because Preston is good at portraying his characters and weaving a pretty interesting story into all of the tree climbing/research stuff.

Some of his terminology he uses is definitely strange, maybe a bit dramatic for effect. Preston's done his homework, but most likely with rec climbers and scholastic people, doesn't seem he really looked into the arb side of things. But all and all it's a good book. I'll see how the ending goes
smile.gif


jp
grin.gif
 
Got the book last night at the book signing in Boston. Started reading it at 9pm and got halfway through by 1am. great read, and Andrews illustrations are awesome (what can't you do moss?)
 
Read it in 12 hours, what a page turner. I wanted to quit my job and beg Steve to let me come be a grad student tomorrow. It changed the way I look at trees. Thanks to all involved.
 
This book and some of the trees are my current focus of study and photographing, so I decided to bump this thread to the surface after finding it - found it on a Google search, not a Buzz search.

The thread already has plenty of good links and content.

Hopefully, this will catch the attention of Moss again..

MOSS ... If you are reading this ...

I'm curious - how long does it take to draw an illustration like the one you did of Illuvatar?

Do you make the drawing the same size as the original photo? Do you need to use a certain hardness of pencil to do it?

How do you store your drawing work to keep it safe from damage?

When you deliver the final drawing, how do you send it? Or will the customer like Preston pick it up in-person?
 
Howdy all... My regards to all involved in the production of this great book: a wonderfull source of information and entertainment!

Speaking as an Ecologist and certified Arborist, it's a new day on this troubled yet complexly beautifull planet when light of such a group of individuals break into the media giving the gerneral public an oppertunity to understand something beyond human time... a glimps into 'tree time, and space'. Although not as prominant as it once was, the mind frame of believing the planet Earth was 'given to us' as a place to live and harvest can no longer hold any merrit as through the help of such brave and passionate individuals as presented in "The Wild Trees." Please listen to Dr. Sillet when he asks us to leave the old growth of our planet alone. Yes we may admire the richness of the Earth, but exploiting that which cannot tolerate our ways is ecological suicide.

I do find one thing odd, however; I read my copy of this book in December over the holiday break, which I purchased at chapters here in Canada. Is it just hitting the shelves in the US now?

peace
 
[ QUOTE ]


I do find one thing odd, however; I read my copy of this book in December over the holiday break, which I purchased at chapters here in Canada. Is it just hitting the shelves in the US now?

peace

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you look at the date of this thread's first posting? It's from last year - thread bumped to the surface
grin.gif


MOSS..

If you drop-in, check out those several questions a couple of replies earlier.
 
[ QUOTE ]
MOSS ... If you are reading this ...

I'm curious - how long does it take to draw an illustration like the one you did of Illuvatar?

Do you make the drawing the same size as the original photo? Do you need to use a certain hardness of pencil to do it?

How do you store your drawing work to keep it safe from damage?

When you deliver the final drawing, how do you send it? Or will the customer like Preston pick it up in-person?

[/ QUOTE ]

Oops, who me? Fell asleep in class again.

I didn't keep track of my hours on Illuvatar. Many, many, hours, my wife declared me insane at the time I was working on it. She was correct.

The drawings are much larger than the photos, at least twice as large and sometimes WAY larger, depends on the drawing.

Only two drawings, the traverse and the lobaria were done in pencil (I like a 3b, but that depends on the drawing). Most of the rest were done with permanent ink markers. The Eucalyptus regnans forest was done with brush and India ink. Illuvatar was done entirely on the computer using a digital tablet. I tweaked the drawing tool to simulate a fine ink stroke. The file is very high resolution, I could only see a small part of the drawing at a time as I was working, like looking through a keyhole at the drawing. I printed frequent paper proofs so I could see what was going on. Who said creating drawings on a computer was easy?

I store the drawings in a cardboard box layered between acid free trace paper.

The maps were nearly as difficult as Illuvatar (which was the most challenging of all). The maps are based on faded photocopies of hand drawn maps, tourist maps with hand scrawled notes, satellite imagery etc., parts are drawn by hand and scanned in, everything was composited, typeset and drawn by hand by me on the computer. I used Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop CS to build the final maps. I'm not a pro map maker so I had to learn as I went, always takes longer that way.

For the maps and drawings multiple versions were created before arriving at the final. Many back and forths with the author, typical for this kind of work. There is quite a bit more work put into it than is shown in the book.

Maps and Illuvatar were delivered as high-quality paper proofs and electronic files, for everything else the paper originals were provided to the publisher. Final art is shipped directly to the publisher's art department. While I was working on the illustrations I put scanned proofs on the web for the author to approve.
-moss
 
[ QUOTE ]


Oops, who me? Fell asleep in class again.

I didn't keep track of my hours on Illuvatar. Many, many, hours, my wife declared me insane at the time I was working on it. She was correct.

The drawings are much larger than the photos, at least twice as large and sometimes WAY larger, depends on the drawing.

Only two drawings, the traverse and the lobaria were done in pencil (I like a 3b, but that depends on the drawing). Most of the rest were done with permanent ink markers. The Eucalyptus regnans forest was done with brush and India ink. Illuvatar was done entirely on the computer using a digital tablet. I tweaked the drawing tool to simulate a fine ink stroke. The file is very high resolution, I could only see a small part of the drawing at a time as I was working, like looking through a keyhole at the drawing. I printed frequent paper proofs so I could see what was going on. Who said creating drawings on a computer was easy?

I store the drawings in a cardboard box layered between acid free trace paper.

The maps were nearly as difficult as Illuvatar (which was the most challenging of all). The maps are based on faded photocopies of hand drawn maps, tourist maps with hand scrawled notes, satellite imagery etc., parts are drawn by hand and scanned in, everything was composited, typeset and drawn by hand by me on the computer. I used Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop CS to build the final maps. I'm not a pro map maker so I had to learn as I went, always takes longer that way.

For the maps and drawings multiple versions were created before arriving at the final. Many back and forths with the author, typical for this kind of work. There is quite a bit more work put into it than is shown in the book.

Maps and Illuvatar were delivered as high-quality paper proofs and electronic files, for everything else the paper originals were provided to the publisher. Final art is shipped directly to the publisher's art department. While I was working on the illustrations I put scanned proofs on the web for the author to approve.
-moss

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks Moss !!

That was such a detailed reply, I quoted you to keep the information on the surface.

That's a lot more procedure than I would have imagined. Just buying the illustrations with the book makes the drawings seem so simple and streamlined. Maybe likewise buying the book in comparison to the research and time to write the draft.
 
I'm reading it right now, it's an amazing story! Richard Preston does a great job describing the near-insane passion Sillet and Taylor had for finding the tallest trees in the world... sex in a treeboat, there's an idea!
 
[ QUOTE ]

Thanks Moss !!

That was such a detailed reply, I quoted you to keep the information on the surface.

That's a lot more procedure than I would have imagined. Just buying the illustrations with the book makes the drawings seem so simple and streamlined. Maybe likewise buying the book in comparison to the research and time to write the draft.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're welcome. As you know when you watch an accomplished climber in a tree they make it look easy. Beneath that ease is many hours of climbing and years of experience. Same goes for making illustrations or writing a book. Preston spent three years researching and writing the book. I can testify from personal experience that he's a very hard worker. His fluid writing style obscures the work that supports it
-moss
 
The Humboldt website about Sillett and his studies of the tree canopies really inspires me to study harder and maybe someday become a canopy scientist. I will definitely be considering graduate school there as an option. I want to read this book, asap. Thanks for the information Moss!!
 
Just got my copy from the library. I went for the CD version to pass the time on my drive to work. Only on the second disk of 10 but a great "read" so far.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom