Is there a tree service school?

Yeah...curriculum. You have to start with: What is "tree work"?

Do you just want to train people feed brush, but not themselves into the chipper? Do you want people with higher aspirations than that? Start with the end in mind then build curriculum from there.

In your earlier list you included some pretty basic stuff but then threw in "how to talk to customers". What does that mean? Not cuss them out? Or explain why XYZ is necessary? Quick example...one day I was at the office of my old job with the State when my wife calls:
"There are people here cutting trees back from the line...one of the guys knocked on the door and asked if they could take one of the trees down?"
"Which tree"
(I hear her asking and him responding "uhhh...it is the maple tree")
My response: "I'll be right home" (there are no maple trees in our yard...it was a Red oak)

Why do I give this example...he may have been the nicest guy in the world, had great manners, personable, etc... but he didn't know the difference between an oak and maple. So is tree ID included in this course? And we can go on from there. I'm thinking there is a reason there isn't such a basic course...

While you have a some valid points, I don’t want to get ahead of myself here.
Of course all of the bigger picture stuff is super important but I’m talking about the beginner stuff here, at least for the first parts of the curriculum, not tree ID. I’m talking about little but super important stuff. Sometimes it’s not who you send to the door that makes the first impression. Sometimes it’s the guy closest to the neighbors walking up with a simple question that make that super important first impression. I once witnessed a excellent tree guy smoking a cigarette in mid conversation with a customer and just about blowing the smoke in the customers face. No offense if you smoke but that’s just bad customer interface. Can you imagine a publicly traded company allowing this amongst their employees? You see my goal is huge! Massive tree army. It’s my opinion that you have to train them from the ground up to be excellent across the board. It’s a small example but part of the big picture.
They should know how to identify trees but they should first know how to look some body in the eyes and say sir and ma’am.
 
There are a couple of schools around here (SUNY Environmental Science and Forestry, and Paul Smiths come to mind) that have decent programs, however working with some of their graduates, they are relatively unprepared for the world of ACTUAL tree work. The climbing, pruning, rigging, equipment operation,etc while understood and discussed in a classroom setting, get limited application until they hit the field.

I'm not saying that that is a necessarily bad thing, just that I think the expectations of a school might not deliver the results that you would expect. Real world vs classroom can be very different. (this coming from someone that studied to be a shop teacher before becoming a tree worker)

I agree that a classroom setting is almost no good for real world applications of tree work. I believe my idea would be more of a guideline of subjects, goals, and test that can mostly be taught and reviewed in the field, while they would probably be followed up with some actual multiple choice questions and maybe an essay or two for each subject. I’m thinking practical real tree work done in the field with a set of guidelines for teaching so we know where to start, what to teach and what to test on.
Some of the “subjects” could clearly not be done in the field. For example if we had a safe driving/backing of trucks and trailers course, we would need a closed course at our facility to teach and test it. If we had a “course” on brush and log breakdown, it could be overviewed and taught in the field, but we would not sit guys down at a customers house to take a written test. It would be tested at our facility. Am I making sense?
 
@CanaryBoss, you're in florida aren't you? There are many colleges up here in the north that do what you're asking...palm prunning/removals; never even talked about. Operating a mini? If you have an employee that can't develop a decent sense of how they work after a day, they will never be a forman for you.

Interesting information. I think there would definitely be a time where those things are an important part of the curriculum. I’m talking foundations at this time. Not everyone has to be a chief but I sure wish they all had the potential to be. I have and have had soo many guys taught on the minis over the years that failed for some other reason. For example; one of the best machinery operators I have ever had the pleasure of knowing, absolutely refused to wear proper PPE. We finally got tired of it and had to part ways with him. I personally taught him many aspects of the industry and wonder today, “did I put the cart before the horse”? If he would have had a foundation in safety before machinery operation would he have valued it enough to follow through or did he learn the right things in the wrong order? You see, I wasted my time with him. he should have never been taught to operate a grapple truck if he wouldn’t keep his safety gear on.
 
While you have a some valid points, I don’t want to get ahead of myself here.
..... not tree ID. I’m talking about little but super important stuff. ......

.
They should know how to identify trees but they should first know how to look some body in the eyes and say sir and ma’am.
I see irony in the first statement.

The second statement...I thought that was called kindergarten (for those not raised to be respectful at home)? I agree, far too many people just don't have a clue about basic professional interactions. It would be good to include "customer interaction etiquette" rather than assuming anything. But how that plays out in the field is probably more of a company culture thing.
 
Thats just a certifcate course, 12 weeks if i remember correctly.
They call it a 1 year certificate program...
https://www.hocking.edu/timber-harvesting-and-tree-care

But they also include timber harvesting, so I don't know how much time they spend on tree care. It may be 12 weeks. I've just heard from others that they do well. Don't know much else about it. Not the national reputation of Paul Smiths...but still an option.
 
CanaryBoss, I’m right beside you! Our team is working on this concept currently. It’s slow going, but I’m figuring out the foundation right now that will shape the system. One major concept is managing expectation. An example- recently an acquaintance called me asking how to get to where I am in my craft. He was really asking how he could shortcut his way to running his own show, with only sawyer experience, and whether he could join our team for his fast track. I told him that it takes 5 years under quality tutelage to be properly prepared for whatever comes his way, and that only to mean he will at that point be able to better identify what is in his wheelhouse and what is beyond his skill. While many grow faster than this, I wanted to set the tone that time is not something to skimp on when investing in skill. We try to deliver the expectation that proficiency, while always being worked toward, won’t be achieved quickly. It’s not an 8 day training then go type job. The vision is of an apprenticeship into a career with many available paths.

Currently our team does have a baptism by fire approach, which is good and bad. Our owner makes a good point that putting someone in over his/her head from time to time gives them a better view of where they are and how they can grow. However, without a consistent system for them to plug into to develop themselves, the growth process can be high stress and slower than need be, and can actually DQ quality people who can’t cope with or learn in that intensity.

Let’s connect by phone and chat it out, I’d love to hear what you’re thinking and working with, and would be happy to share what I’m learning through the process.
 
I appreciate the responses. So what I’m looking for is like; chain saw safety, chipper operation, mini skid operation, parking safety, fall area safety, proper cutting and breakdown of brush and logs. Im even considering the idea of a company guidelines and procedures for conduct on jobs course. I’m not talking “ace” stuff here. Beginners and intermediate courses that can help guys to be safe and efficient while helping us to isolate the potential “aces” and hone their skills.

How do you stack brush piles, feed a chipper, run a skid, talk to and around customers, use PPE, respond in an emergency etc? I feel these are things that all guys should know and it shouldn’t be kept as some mistical skill set only reserved for the long time tree guys. I want to create a curriculum that teaches and tests greenhorn tree workers on these skills. I feel that some of it can be on the job and tested on, While some of it has to be tough off the job and tested on. I want to get away from the method of telling guys stuff as they need to hear and hoping they catch on. I’m welcoming your input.
Are you part of TCIA? They have may great resources and programs you can do.
 
Mid-State Technical College has an Urban Forestry Technician Associates degree.

University of Wisconsin Stevens Point has a bachelor's of science in Urban Forestry.

I'm a graduate of both.

Then there is Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC) Arborist Certificate

Gateway Technical College has an Associates Degree as well for Arboriculture

Then there are numerous horticulture degrees that dabble in arboriculture but aren't solely focused on it. Wisconsin is spoiled in this department.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
CanaryBoss, I’m right beside you! Our team is working on this concept currently. It’s slow going, but I’m figuring out the foundation right now that will shape the system. One major concept is managing expectation. An example- recently an acquaintance called me asking how to get to where I am in my craft. He was really asking how he could shortcut his way to running his own show, with only sawyer experience, and whether he could join our team for his fast track. I told him that it takes 5 years under quality tutelage to be properly prepared for whatever comes his way, and that only to mean he will at that point be able to better identify what is in his wheelhouse and what is beyond his skill. While many grow faster than this, I wanted to set the tone that time is not something to skimp on when investing in skill. We try to deliver the expectation that proficiency, while always being worked toward, won’t be achieved quickly. It’s not an 8 day training then go type job. The vision is of an apprenticeship into a career with many available paths.

Currently our team does have a baptism by fire approach, which is good and bad. Our owner makes a good point that putting someone in over his/her head from time to time gives them a better view of where they are and how they can grow. However, without a consistent system for them to plug into to develop themselves, the growth process can be high stress and slower than need be, and can actually DQ quality people who can’t cope with or learn in that intensity.

Let’s connect by phone and chat it out, I’d love to hear what you’re thinking and working with, and would be happy to share what I’m learning through the process.

You made some good points there. Well worded!

So, we currently have a grading scale we use for pay. I have to be careful here because some of this info is “ours”. We came up with it over years of hard work and management meetings developing this platform. I’m going to be somewhat vague but I’ll give an outline.
This is how we classify and rate our tree guys for their pay range.

Freshman; $12 an hour
-brush dragger
-raker
-equipment set out and put up
-no chain saw use
-no machinery use
-manual labor only
-supervised chipper feeding only

Sophomore; $14
-small saw use
-must be able to change a chain in under 3 minutes
-must know names of various required tree equipment
-chipper feeding, Start up, and stop
-general roping ability
-must be at this class or higher to start to train to climb

Junior; $17
-stump grinder operation
-mini skid use
-medium and big saw use
-pole saw use
-advanced roping ability
-know how to unclog chipper
-understand logistics in job layout
-drive/set up tracked lifts
-must be at this class to qualify for crew leader positions

Senior; $19
-bobcat operation
-understand all aspects of setup and breakdown for job completion
-be able to operate all machinery and move/back up/park all trucks and equipment including loader trucks

This is a general “tree guy” grading scale
For those of you wondering where the climbers and so on fit in, I’m getting there.

We offer what we call “credits” a credit is and addition to your classification. Here they are;

CDL driver with clean record; +$6 an hour

Arborists certification; +$3 an hour

Crew leader; + $3 an hour

Advanced hedge trimmer ;+$1 an hour

Sometimes we have guys who are freshman in the tree industry but do legitimately have mini skid experience so we offer a $1 an hour credit to freshman and sophomore class only for mini skid operation.


CLIMBERS;
I’m not going into details here cause it’s not necessary in my opinion but it looks like this;

Beginner; +$3 an hour
Intermediate; +$5 an hour
Ace; +$8 an hour

Some of our credits are by invitation only. Guys can’t just say; “well I’m a sophomore and I want a raise so I started climbing last week”. They have to ask us. I was having problems with pretty green guys wanting to learn to fast and didn’t want someone to get hurt so I put this in place. There are other regulations as well.

That pretty much encompasses our pay scale. It allows us to have a steadfast model to follow and a direction to go in.
We give this for our sanity and ease of hiring and rating pay but mostly to give our employees a measurable goal to meet. They can see “what’s next” so to speak. In stead of trying to learn to run the bobcat when really they need to change a chain faster.

I’m mention all this because you talked about trial by fire and learning what’s in your wheelhouse. This is the structure we developed to do so. I hope it’s helpful to others as it has been amazingly helpful to us.

This is the platform by which we would probably develop our curriculum order. There are things not listed like time required in a class to move on. Testing process. Things that I think should be added are employee etiquette and company policies. They should be on the front end of the program. We also have a company handbook but it should be taught more thoroughly.
 
Mid-State Technical College has an Urban Forestry Technician Associates degree.

University of Wisconsin Stevens Point has a bachelor's of science in Urban Forestry.

I'm a graduate of both.

Then there is Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC) Arborist Certificate

Gateway Technical College has an Associates Degree as well for Arboriculture

Then there are numerous horticulture degrees that dabble in arboriculture but aren't solely focused on it. Wisconsin is spoiled in this department.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

All that sounds like some pretty good stuff. Would you say that any of it includes the beginner stuff as well?
 
An example- recently an acquaintance called me asking how to get to where I am in my craft. He was really asking how he could shortcut his way to running his own show

I have had this call about a half a dozen yimes this year. I have a consulting platform developed that will be successful but I’m just trying to find the right team to work with and the appropriate amount of time to dedicate to them. It’s just like anything though, it won’t be free. It will be done as a percentage of ownership of growth. If a guy comes to me with a million dollar a year company and has plateaued wants to get to 3 million, I can help him, but I own a percentage of the growth. It’s like the injury attorneys say, “if I don’t win, I don’t get paid”
 
.....
CDL driver with clean record; +$6 an hour

Arborists certification; +$3 an hour
....
Curious why, as a tree care company you place 2x the value on truck driving as a very basic qualification for tree care? Is it just that hard to find (or train) CDL drivers?
 
Curious why, as a tree care company you place 2x the value on truck driving as a very basic qualification for tree care? Is it just that hard to find (or train) CDL drivers?
I think you said it. It’s hard to find a good driver, with a good record that will do tree work. There are a lot of good drivers that won’t get off their butts.
 
On a sidenote, I've realized that initial chainsaw handling, not initial cutting should be done with a heavy saw and big old bar. This will force ergonomics... One can easily 'cheat' with a light saw, especially if strong.

A long time ago I had a noob griund-cutting with good ergonomics in no time, focusing on form/ technique/ ergonomics right away...5'2", buck-20, ms440/28".
I emphasized that, as she found in gymnastics, form without strength, and strength without form, isn't going to cut it.
 
On a sidenote, I've realized that initial chainsaw handling, not initial cutting should be done with a heavy saw and big old bar. This will force ergonomics... One can easily 'cheat' with a light saw, especially if strong.

A long time ago I had a noob griund-cutting with good ergonomics in no time, focusing on form/ technique/ ergonomics right away...5'2", buck-20, ms440/28".
I emphasized that, as she found in gymnastics, form without strength, and strength without form, isn't going to cut it.

Hmm. It’s worth considering i think. I just worry about the inability to recover a kickback on medium sized saw like that without the necessary skill. If you don’t know what your doing, kickback on a saw like that seems much more likely that on a 201t
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATH

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom