I'm gonna try this as an adjustable tether...

I\'m gonna try this as an adjustable tether...

THIS IS EXPERIMENTAL STUFF AND IS NOT APPROVED BY ANYONE OR ANY ORGANIZATION. ANYONE THAT USES THIS TECHNIQUE MUST REALIZE IT IS ESSENTIALLY UNTESTED AND HAS NO HISTORY OF USE IN THIS APPLICATION. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK, REALIZING THIS COULD FAIL RESULTING IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR DEATH.

I'm not sure it offers any particular advantage over other methods, but I made this from a piece of Ice although the same thing could be done with Tenex.

It's simply a fixed eye, tucked tail, stitch locked for security, and a big eye on the other end - basically a homemade Whoopie (I think). At the time I made the pics, I hadn't back-spliced the tail; I'll do that before I climb on it. Here's a couple of pics:

Minimum length:
4302169994_ab486e6edc.jpg


and maximum length for this length of cord:
4302172462_6a5fd31b1a.jpg


I had to fold it to keep from having to back the camera off so far.

Testing:
I couldn't get the tensile machine to do cycle testing; it will, I just couldn't get it to today. However, I did run about a dozen tests manually.

I put the homemade Ice Whoopie in the machine and marked the tail of the eye at the tuck so I could see if it moved and I marked the tail of the adjustable loop where it exited so I could see if it moved.

I smoothed out the adjustable side a bit and applied tension to 300 lbs. I released it and did the same thing two more times.

Then I decided to try something more aggressive. I got some slack in the line and crumpled the eye splice and left it unstraightened and ran the tension up to 500 lbs. I repeated that about 9 or 10 more times, re-crumpling the eye before each loading.

Results:
The eye may have moved ever so slightly, it at all, but that's about it. The adjustable loop had a bit of creep, but I expected it to. I did not do a pull to destruction because this is the only piece I have, and I want to give it a test climb tonight so I didn't want it damaged.

Certainly a locked brumel would be a secure method, but they are big and ugly and add complexity to the splice and you still have to lock stitch it or whip it.

This is the second test I've done on cover only or hollow cover type splices that were secured only with lock stitching. I see absolutely no distortion in the stitching. I took a slightly different approach to the stitching pattern than I normally use.

It's a beautiful day here, the temperature is almost perfect; I'm going home shortly and try this thing on a climb.

Realize this is very minimal testing and far from exhaustive and once again,

THIS IS EXPERIMENTAL STUFF AND IS NOT APPROVED BY ANYONE OR ANY ORGANIZATION. ANYONE THAT USES THIS TECHNIQUE MUST REALIZE IT IS ESSENTIALLY UNTESTED AND HAS NO HISTORY OF USE IN THIS APPLICATION. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK, REALIZING THIS COULD FAIL RESULTING IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR DEATH.
 
Re: I\'m gonna try this as an adjustable tether...

I like the idea and looks like it would work perfect. Seems like a locking brummel would be more secure than a straight burry. I use the locking brummel quite often and I don't find that it is big and ugly and add complexity to the splice and you still have to lock stitch it or whip it, as you stated above. Security should be above all else. I also think you need a back splice in the end of the adjustable leg. All whoopies and loopies have these back splices. Again, very good idea, just needs a little tweaking.
grin.gif
 
Re: I\'m gonna try this as an adjustable tether...

I use a locked brumel for I2I 8mm BeeLine, but I like a double braid splice in BeeLine even better, but I haven't had a chance to test a double braid eye in BeeLine. A double braid splice is used on 10mm BeeLine.

One of the purposes of cycle testing was to get an indication of the security of just a lock stitch. As soon as I can get our machine doing cycles, I'm gonna run about 100 cycles on just locked stitched.

So far, for nearly a dozen manual cycles there has been no indication of movement or stitches being strained.

It does need a back splice; this piece didn't have it because I was machine testing it. I will put a back splice in it before I use it, and I may even go with a locked brumel before it's all said and done.

Thanks for the suggestions!
 
Re: I\'m gonna try this as an adjustable tether...

I wonder if the strength of whoopies like this would change much if there was a pulley in place of the biner on the right hand side.
 
Re: I\'m gonna try this as an adjustable tether...

[ QUOTE ]
a pulley in place of the biner on the right hand side.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not that I've noticed. I use this as my main riggin slings. I got so sick of replacing nylon runners every 2 weeks. I started to by a whole spider wire line of 200 foot. from that point I just splice up how long I want them.
 
Re: I\'m gonna try this as an adjustable tether...

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder if the strength of whoopies like this would change much if there was a pulley in place of the biner on the right hand side.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very good question. Yes!

The friction of the biner or similar item will make the adjustable eye more secure. When I have set up a biner to act like a pulley and pulled down on one leg to lift a weight on the other, I measured the relative forces on the two legs at roughly 2:1. That means, in the case of our adjustable eye, that only 1/3 of the load is trying to slip the eye and 2/3 is on the cover leg, squeezing the core and preventing slip. With a perfect pulley we would have 1/2 the load trying to slip the eye and only 1/2 the load doing useful squeezing.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom