block/ pulley

I would say no. Blocks r for rigging and pulleys r for, well... Pulling stuff. Those r fine for little stuff. But any time u are actually rigging and removing a lead or a tree grab a loopie and an actuall block. Get those carabiners out of the system.;) The little bit extra weight buys u a lot more piece of mind.
 
As well if I biner my omni 'block' on that would make it a pulley but if I spliced it into a loopie it would be a block.

And anything can take a dynamic load or shock load as long as you stay with in the swl.

If I use a biner or an xring as a 'redirect' by some definitions that would make them a pulley. They are changing the direction/ angle of the line.
 
So blocks are wood, pulleys are metal. Got it! ;)

I'm starting to think that there's no easy answer on this one, though for all intents and purposes I like my way of explaining it. C'mon guys, it's how I've trained employees for years. I can't back out now. :)

And, what about the article I linked? If it's in writing in a published article it has to be true doesn't it??? Kidding. But the author, Michael Tain won't be happy.

I'm enjoying the debate.
 
Last edited:
I think we're in an exciting time to be involved in tree work. Equipment and techniques are evolving rapidly. It is important off our industry to have generally accepted terms for things. Items like the Pinto and the Omni, techniques like SRT (or SRWP) are really a paradigm shift in our industry. Finally we are having things designed solely with tree work in mind, rather than cannibalizing equipment from other disciplines. I love the buzz because it helps me keep up, something that can be tough in this arboricultural dead zone I call home.
 
As well if I biner my omni 'block' on that would make it a pulley but if I spliced it into a loopie it would be a block.

And anything can take a dynamic load or shock load as long as you stay with in the swl.

If I use a biner or an xring as a 'redirect' by some definitions that would make them a pulley. They are changing the direction/ angle of the line.

A couple of good points you have here. Perhaps the words "rotating sheave" should be included in both definitions. Also, perhaps a quantification is in order for the shock loading portion of the "block" definition. Although, I have no idea what that might amount to. Any suggestions? Perhaps that quantification already exists in the proper definition of the term "shock-loading". I'm sure we could go on and on with this.
 
According to the ISA's glossary of Arboricultural terms (1) a block is a heavy duty pulley used in rigging. Designed for dynamic loading. (2) casing enclosing one or more parallel pulleys.

What is heavy duty? At work we run a 5/8" cmi 'block' on a tenex eye sling. But if I drove down to do a euc I'd be less than prepared. That's all right tool right job, cycles to failure, swl, etc.
But ISA says a block is a pulley, paraphrasing of course I'll have to see if I dig deep into enough dictionaries to hammer out something better
 
In my experiences a block has two integrated sheaves whereas a pulley has only one. They are both capable of performing the same functions.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom