Career awaits!!!

All the power to you, and nothing personal, but I’m astonished that a single year of climbing will get you hired for contract climber wages. This just challenges my sense of equity.
We sure aren’t going to hire someone with only one year of climbing experience as a contractor for $500 per day! $350 maybe, but that’s a stretch even for a minimally experienced climber with proper insurance, and all his own tools, and clear proof of skill.

At $350/day, a climber with any skill would cost us that much to employ, after we pay wages, insurance, and taxes. An employee costs roughly 2.5x his daily wages to employ, so $350 per day is what it costs us to pay someone $17.50/hour for an 8 hour day.

Many self employed persons think they’re making big money at those rates, but in reality if you do the math, long term they’re actually losing money by working for themselves if they’re working legally, paying taxes and proper insurance, buying and maintaining a truck and tools.
 
Many self employed persons think they’re making big money at those rates, but in reality if you do the math, long term they’re actually losing money by working for themselves if they’re working legally, paying taxes and proper insurance, buying and maintaining a truck and tools.
I have tried to explain this to a few of these individuals, and they don’t get it. They won’t be able to afford replacing their little trucks that they are pushing to the max level of service or more day in and day out when they need major mechanicals. I do get a reaction when I tell them that I didn’t pay myself for 3.5 years- we lived on my wife’s income nursing at night, and had family to help take care of our small children while we started our business. Which, when we started our own thing, it was because I had to travel 75 minutes for a decent wage as a climber- the going rate in town was around $20 an hour, and twice that where I commuted to.
 
I have tried to explain this to a few of these individuals, and they don’t get it. They won’t be able to afford replacing their little trucks that they are pushing to the max level of service or more day in and day out when they need major mechanicals. I do get a reaction when I tell them that I didn’t pay myself for 3.5 years- we lived on my wife’s income nursing at night, and had family to help take care of our small children while we started our business. Which, when we started our own thing, it was because I had to travel 75 minutes for a decent wage as a climber- the going rate in town was around $20 an hour, and twice that where I commuted to.
Glad to see someone else gets it! I’ve been self-employed and/or a small business owner for 18 years and spent far too many of those years basically working for free. A couple of those years I actually did work for free, after I paid for everything that broke. I’ve learned a lot lessons since, and try to save others from the same mistakes, but there’s a lot of people out there as stubborn as I!

One of the biggest things I had to learn is that my personal income and the income of the business (even if there are no employees) are separate. The company pays me, and has to have a profit left over or there’s something wrong. Sure, times come up where we go a month or few without the company making a profit (This summer we had three trucks lose transmissions!) but as a rule, the company must make a profit separately from my own income.
 
We sure aren’t going to hire someone with only one year of climbing experience as a contractor for $500 per day! $350 maybe, but that’s a stretch even for a minimally experienced climber with proper insurance, and all his own tools, and clear proof of skill.

At $350/day, a climber with any skill would cost us that much to employ, after we pay wages, insurance, and taxes. An employee costs roughly 2.5x his daily wages to employ, so $350 per day is what it costs us to pay someone $17.50/hour for an 8 hour day.

Many self employed persons think they’re making big money at those rates, but in reality if you do the math, long term they’re actually losing money by working for themselves if they’re working legally, paying taxes and proper insurance, buying and maintaining a truck and tools.
This is correct. Most people don't have a proper understanding of the money that they are actually making or spending.

I offered a contract guy 75k for 1500 hours with solid 401k match + benefits. Whatever gear he wanted paid for. I figured that would run me a probably 105-110k after tax, comp, benefits etc. He is the real deal though. Lots of experience and no messing around. Worth more than that probably.

He quite quickly declined, saying he is hoping to make 100k contracting on his own. I explained to him that 1500 hours leaves him plenty of time to do side work with his own gear, and still meet that 100k while having comp and benefits paid for etc etc.
Instead we decided I would lock him in every Monday-Tuesday at $500/day for the year. Between rain days, Monday holidays and his vacations, he will probably only work 80 days - 40k (plus workers comp) call it 10,000 as a high number = $50,000.

It works way way better for me in this situation. He is self employed and represents himself. Has his own nice tools that he takes care of and respects. Has his own reputation at stake, and knows that if he starts to suck and I get rid of him, he won't have the reliable two days a week (he could, I'm sure, go out and fill those days up, but it's nice to have steady work and a lot of the time it's not very difficult what I have him doing....)

If I were paying him as my employee, after a month he'd be thinking he was worth more, would want more time off, then complain he's not getting enough hours if there were some rain days. Be buying him lots of gear. Wouldn't want to do this or that..... He'd be around all the time and we'd start to get sick of each other and he'd be thinking he should have stuck it out as a contract climber.


Two days a week we are excited to see each other. Crew is high energy. Almost honeymoon stage.

I found another contract guy same rate 500/day two days a week comes in Wednesday and Thursday. I like it that way. Plus if you give them heads up, they can find something else to do and don't have to feel bad about leaving them at home like you would an employee.


Downside.... They can't lead a crew. I don't have them drive any trucks, and they don't know what they are doing until they get there. Plus, they technically aren't there to tell other people what to do, they are there to climb. So you need some degree of crew leader. In my situation, it's typically me. Which works well, because if there is an annoying climb or dead tree that someone would complain about, miserable poison ivy tree, I'll go in and do the dirty work..... You could have a crew leader that didn't climb at all, no problem. But still would need to direct people + have personnel to get equipment to jobs.

I'd rather hire an equipment operator as a crew leader who knows the business for 35-40/hr+ to direct the ground personnel and sub climbers that can be trusted to see the job through. The climbers think they are making a million and are happy to work hard a day or two a week. Just need someone to direct them and the support guys to make the projects efficient.

Honestly, in the equipment operator running the crew situation, tell him you'll start him at 35, with option for 40 after a month if he works out. Tell him if it works out after a year, give him a good salary. No one who is worth it wants to work for cheap, but if you start a stranger out at 100k, they might not be worth it, or start out great and end up in the shit house a month in..... Hard to find people that's the truth.
 
**^^Paying enough is important, but if you start someone with a years experience out at 100k, you won't be able to go down from there. Maybe the way is to have a ladder negotiated before starting. Start here and can grow to here within a year if both people are happy with production etc..........
Money aside, it's hard to find people who are happy to work hard. If you find one, you have to pay or they'll leave if they are smart...
 
All the power to you, and nothing personal, but I’m astonished that a single year of climbing will get you hired for contract climber wages. This just challenges my sense of equity.
Not everyone is created equal. I grew up cutting wood with a chain saw, I have worked full time since 16 and have leadership experence. In a world where just showing up, keeping your word and having a good work ethic not as common place as it used to be its valued. I have worked for diffrent smaller companies with varying levels of experence from the owners. Some having as little as 3 years in the industry and others with over 30 years. I am a "new" climber and I fully know this this. I can get shown up very easily when watching other experienced climbers.

To be clear anything over 350 a day is due to production. This may challenge what your used to or even your sence of equity but I feel your getting caught up on the time I have put in when I am getting paid for what I can get on the ground safetly working with the ground team.

I saw a climber with 3 years experence take down 4 trees and made $800 in 5-6 hours. I did not think he was safe and he did not care for the ground crew but did an amazing amount of work in that time. I could not have done what he did that quickly and be safe. It would have taken me upwards of two days. How is it un equitable for any climber regardless of experence to take on a contract to climb those 4 trees and get them on the ground for $800?
 
There will be a reckoning with this, and in some places it is already brewing.

In our small metro (130,000 ish people) there are 40 some licensed “tree companies” at this point in time- inexperienced individuals benefiting from the little to no barrier to access the market. Established companies can’t find ground workers. We have had an add out for a climber for two years, now offering up to $40/hr with benefits, bonus, and sign-on. I have had only inexperienced people lying about their skills apply. I had one guy, who could

Meanwhile the internet is collecting droves of negative reviews of the quality of work of these small startups. There has also been a fatality or near fatality a year for the past few years in our area.

Yesterday, I got an email from the city (yes on a Saturday…) saying they are now going to perform an interview as a part of the application process for licensing. Hopefully this marks a turn for our area in safety, quality of work, and availability of workers.

Good luck everyone!
I have full faith in the market to shake our the bad apples. You will also always have customers who so badly want the lowest price they will pick company who does shoddy work or will get scammed. High barrier to entry does not fix customers who dont want to pay or do there due diligence. I am sure many on here have had to come in after such crews. This is a question of integrity not experence. Any new company or individual with integrity will stick to work they are comfortable and qualified to do. Or partner up with those who are to get the job done well and professionally for their clients
 
**^^Paying enough is important, but if you start someone with a years experience out at 100k, you won't be able to go down from there. Maybe the way is to have a ladder negotiated before starting. Start here and can grow to here within a year if both people are happy with production etc..........
Money aside, it's hard to find people who are happy to work hard. If you find one, you have to pay or they'll leave if they are smart...
I like your mentality and feel your approach is good. Many companies do not realize this lession of paying the top quality workers enough and after this happens enough a guy will go out on his own and become a competitor. I have always been happy to work hard!
 
We sure aren’t going to hire someone with only one year of climbing experience as a contractor for $500 per day! $350 maybe, but that’s a stretch even for a minimally experienced climber with proper insurance, and all his own tools, and clear proof of skill.

At $350/day, a climber with any skill would cost us that much to employ, after we pay wages, insurance, and taxes. An employee costs roughly 2.5x his daily wages to employ, so $350 per day is what it costs us to pay someone $17.50/hour for an 8 hour day.

Many self employed persons think they’re making big money at those rates, but in reality if you do the math, long term they’re actually losing money by working for themselves if they’re working legally, paying taxes and proper insurance, buying and maintaining a truck and tools.
I would not expect to get hired full time for $500 a day. For me anything over $350 is production. Employees suck in many ways. The high overhead is one. The lack of skin in the game is another. I have always done better with contract work. It leaves room for innovation and motivation to get the job done. Set your standards and let's see how fast the work can get done.

I have my own tools (have to take care of them) carry my own insurance (motivation to stay safe or I pay for any mistake) with a contracked rate for the work I have motivation to get the work done in a timely manner.

The employer/employee model I just dont jive with personally
 
This is correct. Most people don't have a proper understanding of the money that they are actually making or spending.

I offered a contract guy 75k for 1500 hours with solid 401k match + benefits. Whatever gear he wanted paid for. I figured that would run me a probably 105-110k after tax, comp, benefits etc. He is the real deal though. Lots of experience and no messing around. Worth more than that probably.

He quite quickly declined, saying he is hoping to make 100k contracting on his own. I explained to him that 1500 hours leaves him plenty of time to do side work with his own gear, and still meet that 100k while having comp and benefits paid for etc etc.
Instead we decided I would lock him in every Monday-Tuesday at $500/day for the year. Between rain days, Monday holidays and his vacations, he will probably only work 80 days - 40k (plus workers comp) call it 10,000 as a high number = $50,000.

It works way way better for me in this situation. He is self employed and represents himself. Has his own nice tools that he takes care of and respects. Has his own reputation at stake, and knows that if he starts to suck and I get rid of him, he won't have the reliable two days a week (he could, I'm sure, go out and fill those days up, but it's nice to have steady work and a lot of the time it's not very difficult what I have him doing....)

If I were paying him as my employee, after a month he'd be thinking he was worth more, would want more time off, then complain he's not getting enough hours if there were some rain days. Be buying him lots of gear. Wouldn't want to do this or that..... He'd be around all the time and we'd start to get sick of each other and he'd be thinking he should have stuck it out as a contract climber.


Two days a week we are excited to see each other. Crew is high energy. Almost honeymoon stage.

I found another contract guy same rate 500/day two days a week comes in Wednesday and Thursday. I like it that way. Plus if you give them heads up, they can find something else to do and don't have to feel bad about leaving them at home like you would an employee.


Downside.... They can't lead a crew. I don't have them drive any trucks, and they don't know what they are doing until they get there. Plus, they technically aren't there to tell other people what to do, they are there to climb. So you need some degree of crew leader. In my situation, it's typically me. Which works well, because if there is an annoying climb or dead tree that someone would complain about, miserable poison ivy tree, I'll go in and do the dirty work..... You could have a crew leader that didn't climb at all, no problem. But still would need to direct people + have personnel to get equipment to jobs.

I'd rather hire an equipment operator as a crew leader who knows the business for 35-40/hr+ to direct the ground personnel and sub climbers that can be trusted to see the job through. The climbers think they are making a million and are happy to work hard a day or two a week. Just need someone to direct them and the support guys to make the projects efficient.

Honestly, in the equipment operator running the crew situation, tell him you'll start him at 35, with option for 40 after a month if he works out. Tell him if it works out after a year, give him a good salary. No one who is worth it wants to work for cheap, but if you start a stranger out at 100k, they might not be worth it, or start out great and end up in the shit house a month in..... Hard to find people that's the truth.
I like this and see it as a good win win with a contract climber who likes his freedom and a buisness owner looking for a good climber.
I actually think a machine operator makes a better crew leader than a climber. He has the ability to be on the phone if needed, talk to the customer and whoever easier then a climber does in my mind
 
I like this and see it as a good win win with a contract climber who likes his freedom and a buisness owner looking for a good climber.
I actually think a machine operator makes a better crew leader than a climber. He has the ability to be on the phone if needed, talk to the customer and whoever easier then a climber does in my mind
It is a win win in terms of us both being free and representing ourselves, but part of my point was that the climber thinks he is making more money than he actually is. In the end he would have cost me more money, and made out better for himself if he had taken the salary. He is costing me roughly the same in the contract climber arrangement for 500/day him using his own equipment, but he is benefitting less in terms of taxes and benefits. Also, because he thinks he is making more, and is, in fact, a separate entity, I get better production from him because of his pride of ownership working for himself.

Working 4 days a week at 500/day for 50 weeks (52 weeks in a year....) is 100k in revenue, and is pretty achievable for someone who has contacts enough to fill that many days and the motivation to keep schedule filled and to perform at a high level on a daily basis. That's before expenses. In terms of 8 hour days, that is 200 days = 1600 hours/year. That doesn't include the extra hours the contract climber spends getting fuel, sharpening saws, maintaining/replacing gear, making their schedule, rescheduling, leaving early for a rain day, getting blown off by a company, going to the bank, fixing or paying for something they broke etc. It's likely that with rain days/snow days/bad weather days, short notice cancellations, inability to fill schedule, lack of motivation, and the vacation days, the contract climber who is looking to work 200 days could easily fall short of that number. Not to mention the added stress/anxiety of filling their schedule, depending on the person.

Two of the three climbers I hire in as subcontractors financed vehicles (one a mostly new sprinter van and one a new Tacoma) that they write off for their business, but also use for personal use. The van climber bought the van partly to take on road trips, but still writes completely off for his business (extra liability if he gets audited, which probably would never come to anything, but worth putting on the con side..). Sprinter vans and Tacomas aren't cheap. Nor are the 5 or 6 saws and all the gear he has. Wouldn't be surprised he comes in right around 75k for 200-300 more hours of work per year than would have been needed as a salaried employ. He would get no benefits, and would owe something like 25,000 out of pocket at the end of the year in taxes if he chose not to pay quarterly. Knowing what I did when I started out, that would be just about all the money he will have in the bank....

There is certainly a benefit to working for yourself. More freedom. It's great, but you're not going to get rich off of it based on this example, especially not if you are coasting along and unmotivated expecting work to come your way. Have to fight for it a bit more. Everyone hears 5-600/day and gets excited about it (tree company owners, contract climbers, and hourly employees alike), but the grass isn't as green as it seems. It's not for everyone.
 
And my conclusion is that I'll happily hire them in at 500/day because it's all around a better deal for me than to pay them at a rate of 100k with benefits per year (75k for 1500 hours is the same rate as 100k for 2000 hours ---40 hours a week with two weeks paid vacation). All the better if they are convinced that they are getting a better deal with the day rate.
 
And my conclusion is that I'll happily hire them in at 500/day because it's all around a better deal for me than to pay them at a rate of 100k with benefits per year (75k for 1500 hours is the same rate as 100k for 2000 hours ---40 hours a week with two weeks paid vacation). All the better if they are convinced that they are getting a better deal with the day rate.
Its good to see you have done the numbers for both ways to hire a climber and see 500 a day is reasonable for a climber who can produce.

Everyone is diffrent. Some care about the security and benefits of being an employee and others care more about there freedom and flexibility of being there own boss. I choose freedom over security ;-).

I want to put my self in a place were I am in more control over what I make. As in no cap to what I can make. If I hustle I make more. To many people coast being an employee unless there are incentive structures set in place and I rarely see that.
 
We sure aren’t going to hire someone with only one year of climbing experience as a contractor for $500 per day! $350 maybe, but that’s a stretch even for a minimally experienced climber with proper insurance, and all his own tools, and clear proof of skill.

At $350/day, a climber with any skill would cost us that much to employ, after we pay wages, insurance, and taxes. An employee costs roughly 2.5x his daily wages to employ, so $350 per day is what it costs us to pay someone $17.50/hour for an 8 hour day.

Many self employed persons think they’re making big money at those rates, but in reality if you do the math, long term they’re actually losing money by working for themselves if they’re working legally, paying taxes and proper insurance, buying and maintaining a truck and tools.
I agree with the 1st paragraph. I respectfully challenge the" 2.5x his daily wage to employ." $30/hour man cost you $600/day? Wouldnt you be better off with a $500/day sub then. That a $100 a man hour is some kind of barely getting by number. Thats $2400 a day gross for 3 guys. If you arent turning good profit on $2400 a day with 3 man crew all making I presume $30/hour or less something isnt right. I am clear on all the hidden costs so I take your point there, I just question the numbers not your understanding of the business.
 
Last edited:
I have tried to explain this to a few of these individuals, and they don’t get it. They won’t be able to afford replacing their little trucks that they are pushing to the max level of service or more day in and day out when they need major mechanicals. I do get a reaction when I tell them that I didn’t pay myself for 3.5 years- we lived on my wife’s income nursing at night, and had family to help take care of our small children while we started our business. Which, when we started our own thing, it was because I had to travel 75 minutes for a decent wage as a climber- the going rate in town was around $20 an hour, and twice that where I commuted to.
1st I respect the heck out of you fellas that regularly post solid info here. Hearing people say they didnt make any money for years is a bit baffling though.
 
1st I respect the heck out of you fellas that regularly post solid info here. Hearing people say they didnt make any money for years is a bit baffling though.
Assuming I am included in your shout out, respect rightfully returned.

To answer your question, that is why I (now) have nice equipment. There was also plenty of “wheel spinning” as I learned the true costs of this business for myself. Last, it was always our intention to put everything earned back in until we found our groove. That’s how long it took.
 
Assuming I am included in your shout out, respect rightfully returned.

To answer your question, that is why I (now) have nice equipment. There was also plenty of “wheel spinning” as I learned the true costs of this business for myself. Last, it was always our intention to put everything earned back in until we found our groove. That’s how long it took.
Thats a fair response and good on you for working hard and making it happen. For me I climbed for 20 years employee/sub climber before I started my own show. Watched what worked and what hung people up, down to what truck and chipper I wanted specifically. For years painstakingly worked on every job and evaluated every hour spent and how that matched up to my bidding process. Investing in equipment only as my revenue matched. Not saying anybodys experience is right or wrong just curious about other peoples processes.
 

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom