Shigo?

[TimberJack]

Could it be im told maybe any one in the know able to confirm

 

[Tom Dunlap]

That doesn't look like a shigo-related chart

What are you asking)

 

[Tony]

This looks more like what you are referring to. Courtesy of Asplund from quite a few years ago.

It serves a point but is not entirely accurate. Studies have shown that preventing all incidents does not necessarily lead to a reduction in fatalities/serious injury.

Fatalities/ serious injuries are generally caused by gross neglect of major safety protocol(s). Preventing paper cuts will not stem the tide. Useful, but not a solution to save lives. Both must be done.

The value of the illustration lies in showing how actions and attitudes overlay. I also illustrates how incidents of varying severity build.

 

[Jem4417]

The heinrich pyramid is the serious, non serious and near miss one. The ctsp book added the behaviors and attitudes for he lagging indicators. Don't quote me completely. @Tony where did you get that pyramid? I like the categories. Gives better detail

 

[Tony]

The heinrich pyramid is the serious, non serious and near miss one. The ctsp book added the behaviors and attitudes for he lagging indicators. Don't quote me completely. @Tony where did you get that pyramid? I like the categories. Gives better detail

Asplund numbers

Tony

 

[Jem4417]

Asplund numbers

Tony

Is that new? I've been gone from there for 3 years. Their foreman manual only had the Heinrich pyramid

 

[Tony]

Is that new? I've been gone from there for 3 years. Their foreman manual only had the Heinrich pyramid

No, not new probably 10 + years. Been in NATS & ArbCanada presentations for some time. I imagine Scott P or Dwayne scabbed it from somewhere/someone.

I still use it as the value lies in the points discussed above not the actual numbers or their accuracy.

Tony

 

[TimberJack]

Irregardless to whose material or handwriting it maybe I think its an important visual to a realistic concept.