- Location
- Home of the New Jersey Devils
Hello all. I am just wondering how the rules that are currently used at the ITCC go over with all of you. This is a very imortant topic to me and I hope that I will hear some serious replies on the matter. This event is an important part of the industries future and I feel that it needs to continue to advance.
One feeling that I personally have is that: If the Master's Challenge will continue to exist as it does now (being a winner take all/ sudden death event) then I feel that either there should be a judge from each of the four chapters that have climbers advancing to the finale, or there should be n o judges from any of the chapters that will be represented. How does this sound to you?
This is the procedure at the olympics.
I would also like to see the Master's scores posted publically with the judges names next to the score that they logged. (also done at the olympics) It helps to ease peoples minds and keep the event on track. Anyone?
One feeling that I personally have is that: If the Master's Challenge will continue to exist as it does now (being a winner take all/ sudden death event) then I feel that either there should be a judge from each of the four chapters that have climbers advancing to the finale, or there should be n o judges from any of the chapters that will be represented. How does this sound to you?
I would also like to see the Master's scores posted publically with the judges names next to the score that they logged. (also done at the olympics) It helps to ease peoples minds and keep the event on track. Anyone?